original vs modified exhaust manifolds

No tech discussion, please

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
66CustomCab
New Member
New Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:19 pm

original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by 66CustomCab »

So I'm thrilled to have this new toy, but finding some of the modifications made by previous owners annoying. Needed to change the starter on this 352 today, and found the "long pipe" manifolds that had been put on made that impossible. Sure, they look cool and I suppose they would improve flow over the flat single tube original manifolds, but are they really necessary? :?

After several hours I found the solution... my sawzall. I now have a new starter, but also a really loud truck :doh: Now the decision needs to be made. Buy another set of fancy pipes, or back to original equipment? :hmm:

I'm never going to race this truck, not seeing the point of all the "upgrades". Any thoughts? :help:
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4924
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by DuckRyder »

On a bump you simply have to remove the header and reinstall.

FE exhaust manifolds are VERY restrictive, headers would be the number one thing to do to increase power. You’ll also have to replace/reconfigure the exhaust to match the manifolds should you choose to go back with them.

But it is pretty much a choice based on your preferences
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
Bill Ramsey
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:01 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by Bill Ramsey »

why the heck would you cut the header when you can simply unbolt them? you ruined them.
1968 Highboy
1976 Highboy
1969 F250 Camper Special
1941 Dodge Power Wagon
1930 Model A Coupe (Hotrod)
1962 Fairlane 500 Sports Coupe
VW Sandrails
Honda ATC's
36' Diesel Pusher for roughing it.
66CustomCab
New Member
New Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:19 pm

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by 66CustomCab »

First, the headers were already ruined, rusted thru in several spots. It would have to happen anyway, just not planning on doing it so soon. Second, they were bent so badly I couldn't remove two of the bottom bolts at all.

As for restrictive, (and yes, having to reconfigure) that's my conundrum. Certainly easier to just buy the same thing, but in the future if (when) I need to get at a hat starter again, the same problem will arise. Nobody has given a strong reason not to go back to original, so I will leave that option on the table for now.

thanks for your thoughts...
User avatar
jzjames
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1776
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:59 pm
Location: Washington, Windy Point

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by jzjames »

With my old truck (69 F100) I had the bolts on the headers set up to easily loosen, slightly move the header to get clearance to get to the starter and pull it out.
Then just re-tighten the header bolts. Voila :D

I think this is a pretty common fact with those folks who use headers.

My header bolts were actually allen-head bolts, again, kept in condition to be easily loosened.

I’d say go with another set of quality headers = :2cents:
User avatar
sargentrs
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 9866
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:30 am
Location: Georgia, Jasper

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by sargentrs »

You could always go with shorties or block huggers https://www.summitracing.com/parts/hed- ... odel/f-100 Wouldn't give you the same boost as the long tube but they'd beat the OEM and give you more clearance for the starter problem. You'll probably have a difficult time finding some original manifolds in good condition and the price wouldn't be that far off.
Randy
1970 F100 Sport Custom Limited LWB, 302cid, 3 on the tree. NO A/C, NO P/S, NO P/B. Currently in 1000 pcs while rebuilding. Project thread: http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=59995 Plan: 351w, C4, LSD, pwr front disc, p/s, a/c, bucket seats, new interior and paint.
1987 F-150 XLT Lariat, 5.0/C6 auto.
User avatar
1972hiboy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:44 pm
Location: California, Santa Cruz

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by 1972hiboy »

I purposely went back to stock manifolds to eliminate the access problems. For me, I did not feel like I needed headers. Never been sorry about it. :2cents:
Rich
1973 f350 super c/s 460/c6 22k orig miles
1972 f350 srw crewcab special 390
1972 f250 4x4 sport custom 390fe Red
1972 f250 4x4 custom 360 FE " Ranger Ric"
1972 f250 4x4 custom 84k og miles 390
1971 f250 4x4 sport custom 56k og miles. 360
1970 f250 4x4 428 fe hp60 205 d60
Dont eat yellow snow.....
User avatar
FLASH 1
New Member
New Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:26 pm
Location: North Carolina, Reidsville

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by FLASH 1 »

HERE Over the years I have found and this going back 30 years + Headers run so hot that eats starters up... I have many times had to replace on the side of the road in hot weather a starter,, once we threw those junk headers off Got the stock manifolds had them coated, run the stock pipes with a crossover pipe < H-Pipe > and truck ran real fine WITH NO STATER ISSUES .. Now if you want to run headers I would cut each tube separate that bolts to the head so you would get a better fit,, Never-Sieze on all the bolts.. Oh yes you can buy those fancy starters but what if you go on a trip starter fails, you will then have to find a source to get you going so stuck getting a starter from the parts house unless your broke down in front of Summit or Jegs or the little brown truck is going to deliver it to you on the side of the road :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Tom, where Ford Trucks Rule
1956 Big Window
1964 F-750 Flat Bed
1965 M-100 Mercury
1966 M-350 Mercury
1966 F350 Wrecker
1972 F-350 Crew Cab
1997 F-450 7.3 with 85,000 original miles
2006 F-150 Crew Cab
2008 F-650 Crew Cab Roll Back 6.7 Cummins
2020 Flat Top Peterbilt Roll Back PX-7 Engine
and 2 cars 1968 XLT and 2017 Mustang
User avatar
farmallmta
New Member
New Member
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:00 pm

You're getting good advice on factory manifolds here

Post by farmallmta »

:yt:
Bias alert: when I was younger, I loved headers. As I've gotten older and more experienced, I've taken them off everything I own and will never put any back on, unless they're the rare factory Ford cast iron headers. I do have a 406 with those on it.

Headers help the evacuation of spent combustion gasses from the cylinder. They also reduce the backpulses from the cylinder into the intake manifold as the intake valve opens, resulting in a more even flow (but still not entirely smooth, by any means) of fresh air and fuel vapor into the cylinder. Think of the combination effect as a bit extra air and fuel entering the cylinder, like free supercharging.

However, this effect is minimal at low to moderate loads and RPMs of under 5000. Where you see the greatest positive effect from headers is under heavy load at higher RPMs, the tube lengths and overall design affecting where in the RPM range the effect is greatest. This could be flat-out racing or extended hill climbing with a heavy load. If you are not engaged in either of those two, you're going to find headers to be a way more expensive and headache proposition than any possible benefit you'll get from them.

The FE engines in our trucks almost all face ordinary driving conditions under low to moderate load and engine speeds. Header benefits under such conditions include:
1) increase of ordinary torque of about 10-20 ft-lbs under 3500 RPM
2) horsepower increase of about 5-10 under 3500 RPM
3) fuel economy increase of about 1/2 to 2/3 MPG

Header drawbacks under such conditions include:

1) Cost of headers, decent ones in excess of $300 plus high quality gaskets
2) Ceramic or other temperature control coating to extend life in order to reduce heat radiating to starter $200
3) Installation of headers, including new exhaust system to fully take advantage of them, about $800
4) Recommend smaller starter to accommodate heat shielding, about $300
5) Occasional/frequent gasket failure, requiring reinstall
6) Heat soaked starter problems, occasional outright failure requiring starter replacement, troublesome with headers in the way
7) In-cab noise increase of headers is often noticeable, to some ears highly annoying
Cost of headers done right, approximately $1,600

What you get for $1,600 is mostly noise, ongoing maintenance issues and bragging rights, the glow that comes from having performance parts that other people think are impressive, but really aren't for daily driving. What you don't get is much improvement in performance or fuel economy under ordinary use conditions.

If you're pulling heavy loads at higher RPM's, or if you're racing your truck, then there is a much better case to be made for steel tube headers. Or if you just "want to".

Here's some additional good information to soak up on headers if you're truly interested in the subject http://www.hotrod.com/articles/header-basics/

Hope this helps. :2cents:
Ohiotinkerer
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 5:49 pm
Location: Galion, Ohio

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by Ohiotinkerer »

:yt:

That's why I had my stock manifolds milled and put them back on - the cost vs return for what I'm gonna be using my bump for. It would have made no sense for me to spend the money for the headers alone since all I'm doing is using it for when I need a truck or occasionally taking it to a show. Now if I was doing the engine and going with a cam, carb, higher compression etc then I would have done it. Just comes down to what you are gonna be doing with it whether or not its worth it...........my :2cents: on it....... :D
"Life is a garden - dig it"........... :thup:

1968 F100 2wd - Rangoon Red - 360 w/T18 - power steering and brakes
1997 Honda CBR 900RR
User avatar
Jacksdad
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 579
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:52 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by Jacksdad »

I have stock manifolds and front pipes on a 352, and I've always had starter heat soak bad enough to stop my bump being a daily driver. Even a heatshield around the (third) starter hasn't helped. I'm thinking of wrapping the first section of exhaust next.

And change the FE for a Windsor...
:yt:
1971 DRW F350 cab and chassis with an Open Road motorhome conversion, Dana 70, 352 (originally 390)/C6, PS, power front discs, and 159" w/b.
cep62
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2058
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:06 pm
Location: West Michigan

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by cep62 »

Jacksdad wrote: I've always had starter heat soak bad enough to stop my bump being a daily driver. Even a heatshield around the (third) starter hasn't helped. I'm thinking of wrapping the first section of exhaust next.
First , I mean no offence.
Where are you getting your starters ? I've never burned up a starter on a stocker F E ,
But I've learned my lesson , and use bigger than stock battery and starter cables with good ends . (not the clamp on style)
User avatar
Jacksdad
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 579
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:52 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by Jacksdad »

Not sure about the original, but the last two were O'Reilly's. I changed and upgraded the cables too, and checked all the connections and grounds. I finally went with the lifetime warranty starter, even though it didn't solve the problem. That's okay - collecting parts for my 351 build, so it'll get fixed one way or another.
1971 DRW F350 cab and chassis with an Open Road motorhome conversion, Dana 70, 352 (originally 390)/C6, PS, power front discs, and 159" w/b.
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4924
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by DuckRyder »

You can also get around the issue of removing the header to change the starter by running one of the mini starters.

Some thing else to look into might be if factory “cast iron headers” will fit.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
farmallmta
New Member
New Member
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:00 pm

Re: original vs modified exhaust manifolds

Post by farmallmta »

Jacksdad wrote:I have stock manifolds and front pipes on a 352, and I've always had starter heat soak bad enough to stop my bump being a daily driver. Even a heatshield around the (third) starter hasn't helped. I'm thinking of wrapping the first section of exhaust next.

And change the FE for a Windsor...
There is no way you're getting heat soak from stock manifolds and exhaust pipes correctly routed sufficient to cause quality starters to cease working. It just never happens unless you're getting that system glowing red hot... then it's not the exhaust system or the starter, it's timing, ignition, fuel, etc.

My personal extensive experience is that the starters coming from O'Reilly and Autozone for FE motors are complete garbage. The snouts break, the bendix ceases to acctuate, the motor doesn't turn. It's one thing after another with them. I no longer buy starters from those companies. Instead, get a good rebuildable core and have a local automotive battery and electric shop rebuild the starter. Once I started doing that, no more starter problems.
Post Reply